Peer-Review Report - online instrument

Article title

Referent (Name and academic title)

Institutional affiliation of the referent

E-mail

Article submission deadline

Review due date

EVALUATION

I. GENERAL EVALUATION OF THE ARTICLE

A. Write down one of the following answers: yes, no, partially

1. Is this an original contribution in the field of theology?

2. Does the paper reflect current scientific perspectives on the topic?

3. Do the results of the research agree with the argumentative approach?

4. Are the academic norms for writing a scientific paper respected (clarity, coherence, precision, specialized language in the field of theology, etc.)?

5. Are the bibliographic notes correct, complete and in accordance with the topic?

6. Does the title of the study reflect its content?

7. Traducerea respectă regulile și convențiile la nivel de lexic, gramatică, sintaxă și alte dimensiuni caracteristice textelor religioase?

8. Recenzia respectă caracteristica de aspect critic asupra lucrării?

B. Write down one of the following grades: excellent, good, acceptable, low, very low.

1. Clarity of the summary

2. Degree of novelty

3. Relevance of the conclusions

4. Value of results

II. EVALUATOR'S RECOMMENDATION

ACCEPT AS IS

ACCEPT AS IS OR WITH ONLY MINOR REVISIONS

ACCEPT CONDITIONALLY, UPON COMPLETION OF SPECIFIED REVISIONS

INVITE RESUBMISSION, AFTER EXTENSIVE REVISIONS

REJECT (specifying the reasons)

Reasons

Detailed comments or observations on the content

(justifies the verdict and contains concrete recommendations, possibly page by page, to improve the evaluated work)

CAPTCHA

Math question (4 + 2 =)

Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.